Jesus 4 King Project Endorses Ron Paul 4 President December 12, 2007
Posted by Jesus 4 King in Bible, Christianity, Culture, Faith, God, Jesus, Jesus 4 King Project, Life, News, Politics, Religion, Ron Paul, War, Wordpress Political Blogs, media, spirituality.trackback
Jesus 4 King Project Endorses
Ron Paul 4 President
There are more reasons to endorse Ron Paul than we can list here. We invite you to visit RonPaul2008.com because we think you’ll agree with him on most issues, as do so many other Americans once they discover him.
We do want to point out what we consider to be one of the biggest issues that set him apart from all the other candidates, and that is the issue of War and Foreign Policy.
Despite three quarters of the American public being against the war in Iraq, much of the religious and political establishment continues to insist on sacrificing lives and bankrupting our country, with no end in sight.
Since when did the religion of ‘turn the other cheek’ become the religion of ‘do unto others before they can do unto you’? Jesus said, “The kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and violent men take it by force.” (Matt 11:12) Warmongering crusaders have hijacked Christianity!
America is at a crossroads. She can continue down the suicidal path of self-destruction, or she can return to the principles of freedom contained in the founding documents, largely inspired by the word of God.
If you continue to do what you’ve always done, you’ll continue to get what you’ve always got. The media-anointed candidates want to stay the course, arguing only over specifics. Ron Paul wants to return to the principles of freedom.
Before the internet had become mainstream, nobody would’ve heard about Ron Paul because the establishment media controlled what everyone heard, effectively stifling any opposition to their agenda. These are the same folks that smear Jesus Christ every chance they get.
The people of America have had enough of the establishment telling them what to think. At such a time as this, the Jesus 4 King Project is calling on Christians and all Americans of good conscience to join the revolution and elect Ron Paul for President of these United States.
“The war in Iraq was sold to us with false information. The area is more dangerous now than when we entered it. We destroyed a regime hated by our direct enemies, the jihadists, and created thousands of new recruits for them. This war has cost more than 3,000 American lives, thousands of seriously wounded, and hundreds of billions of dollars. We must have new leadership in the White House to ensure this never happens again.
“Both Jefferson and Washington warned us about entangling ourselves in the affairs of other nations. Today, we have troops in 130 countries. We are spread so thin that we have too few troops defending America. And now, there are new calls for a draft of our young men and women.
“We can continue to fund and fight no-win police actions around the globe, or we can refocus on securing America and bring the troops home. No war should ever be fought without a declaration of war voted upon by the Congress, as required by the Constitution.
“Under no circumstances should the U.S. again go to war as the result of a resolution that comes from an unelected, foreign body, such as the United Nations.
“Too often we give foreign aid and intervene on behalf of governments that are despised. Then, we become despised. Too often we have supported those who turn on us, like the Kosovars who aid Islamic terrorists, or the Afghan jihadists themselves, and their friend Osama bin Laden. We armed and trained them, and now we’re paying the price.
“At the same time, we must not isolate ourselves. The generosity of the American people has been felt around the globe. Many have thanked God for it, in many languages. Let us have a strong America, conducting open trade, travel, communication, and diplomacy with other nations.”
More about Paul
Congressman Ron Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in our nation’s capital. As a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Dr. Paul tirelessly works for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies. He is known among his congressional colleagues and his constituents for his consistent voting record. Dr. Paul never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution.
Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record:
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.
Paul v. Huckabee: One Christian’s Analysis




Why does Ron Paul not respect the Constitutional individual right to privacy?
What a vague question, elaborate Johnny…
please give example of when Ron Paul respect individual privacy, Johnny. All RP has done is try to protect individual rights…Ron Paul is honest and cannot be corrupted with a PERFECT Constitutional voting record. The choice is clear…RP for president or bust.
I could be wrong, but isn’t he opposed Roe v. Wade? The fundamental RoP was found in 1965 by the Supreme Court. They determined that certain penumbras in the bill of rights created a RoP. I think Paul does not believe that based on his views on Roe.
Hey Johnny Peepers,
Actual, your part right. Dr. Paul is pro-life and against Roe Vs. Wade and there are 2 reasons why. First, from a physician’s perspective, the unborn are given rights at conception, meaning he can be sued and have his livelihood taken if he does harm to the unborn. So, there is a logical phallacy to say that in the one case it is a person with legal rights but can still be terminated at will.
The second issue is that Roe V. Wade is not constitutionally sound. Even the liberal Justice Ginsburg has written that the Roe decision is bad constitutional interpretation. What he has done as a member of the house is to introduce legislation that removes Federal Court Jurisdiction from this issue, which is the action that congress can take to check the judiciary in our system of branches checking th power of each other. Then it would be left up to the states to decide individually.
Dr. Paul has stated many times, he doesn’t want to be president of anyone’s life. And he has also stated that in his opinion the more complicated an issue is the more local it ought to be. No one can argue that the abortion issue is not one of the more complex, divisive and polarizing issues in America today and for this reason, and I agree with him, it ought to be handled at the state level.
Wouldn’t the ability for the doctor to terminate the fetal mass prior to delivery minimize his potential for liability? The longer it sits in the womb, the more shit can go wrong with it.
Did you mean to type logical “phallacy”? If you did, it is fitting and funny as hell.
I do not see what civil malpractice liability has to do with fundamental constitutional rights. You have confused me with the conflation.
A resolution to remove federal jurisdiction in the area of fundamental rights protection would be impossible without a constitutional amendment. He can put forth all of the H.R. bills he wants, but they cannot be legally enacted.
I agree it should be handles at the state level too. But to oppose existing law is tantamount to opposing the constitution. The constitution is law, as is supreme court jurisprudence interpreting the constitution per Marbury v. Madison.
I think he is inconsistent and need to explain to the american people why he is wrong.
“All truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed. Finally it is accepted as self-evident.” Schoepenhouer -
A response to johnnypeepers. How can law be constitutional if it is unconstitutional you have to go back to the original intent. Some reading material I would suggest is the declaration of independence, holy bible, federalist and anti federalist, constitution, the law by Frederic Bastiat. When you are finished with that I have more reading material. when you read the federalist papers you will find that anything that contradicts the constitution of the united states is null and void this is the law. So opposing current law is not unconstitutional since the law itself is unconstitutional. Ron Paul is very consistent because he upholds the original intent, remember the laws are null and void.
I’m a Canadian and my mom is an American, I hope she vote for Ron Paul. America was once a great country. Bring back America.
Good to see other concerned Christians who has come out for Ron Paul. I will post a link on my blogspot.